Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

EED 7040 Qualitative Methods in Engineering Education: Qualitative Research Examples

[EED|7040]

Qualitative Research Examples

Ethnography:

Baba, M. L., & Pawlowski, D. (2001, August). Creating culture change: An ethnographic approach to the transformation of engineering education. In International Conference on Engineering Education. Retrieved January (Vol. 15, p. 2009).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239538831_Creating_culture_change_An_ethnograethn_approach_to_the_transformation_of_engineering_education

Crede, E., & Borrego, M. (2013). From ethnography to items: A mixed methods approach to developing a survey to examine graduate engineering student retention. Journal of Mixed Methods Research7(1), 62-80.
https://journals-sagepub-com.dist.lib.usu.edu/doi/full/10.1177/1558689812451792

Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries: The re-organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal Of Engineering Education, 97(4), 433-447.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=35725497&site=ehost-live

Stevens, R., O'Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal Of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355-368.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=34435804&site=ehost-live

Crede, E., & Borrego, M. (2013). From ethnography to items: A mixed methods approach to developing a survey to examine graduate engineering student retention. Journal Of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 62-80.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ989388&site=ehost-live

Carroll, M. P. (2014). Shoot for the moon! the mentors and the middle schoolers explore the intersection of design thinking and STEM. Journal Of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 14-30.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1060017&site=ehost-live

Case Study:

Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R. A., & Miller, R. L. (2010). Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students' motivational values. Journal of Engineering Education99(4), 289-303.
https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.dist.lib.usu.edu/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01064.x

Runeson, P. & Höst, M. (2009.) Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 14, 131-164.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10664-008-9102-8

Magin, D. J., & Churches, A. E. (1995). Peer tutoring in engineering design: A case study. Studies In Higher Education, 20(1), 73-85.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ503298&site=ehost-live

Action Research:

Gelles, L. A. (2019). Career prospects and resources of domestic engineering doctoral students.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7650/

Jorgensen, F., & Kofoed, L. B. (2007). Integrating the development of continuous improvement and innovation capabilities into engineering education. European Journal Of Engineering Education, 32(2), 181-191.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ828267&site=ehost-live

Grounded Theory:

Kinnunen, P., & Simon, B. (2012). Phenomenography and grounded theory as research methods in computing education research field. Computer Science Education22(2), 199-218.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.692928

Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x/abstract

Khiat, H. (2010). A grounded theory approach: Conceptions of understanding in engineering mathematics learning. Qualitative Report, 15(6), 1459-1488.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ914018&site=ehost-live

Phenomenology:

Seeman, K. (2003.) Basic principles in holistic technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 14(2).
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v14n2/seemann.html

Arnold, M. (2003). On the phenomenology of technology: the “Janus-faces” of mobile phones. Information & Organization, 13(4), 231. doi:10.1016/S1471-7727(03)00013-7
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=10117392&site=eds-live

Chari, D., Irving, P., Howard, R., & Bowe, B. (2012). Identifying knowledge, skill and competence for nanoscience and nanotechnology research: A study of postgraduate researchers' experiences. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 28(5), 1046-1055.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=83519746&site=ehost-live

Lee, C. S., McNeill, N. J., Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M. E., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). Indispensable resource? A phenomenological study of textbook use in engineering problem solving. Journal Of Engineering Education, 102(2), 269-288. doi:10.1002/jee.20011
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=89219021&site=ehost-live

Narrative Inquiry:

Villanueva, I., & Di Stefano, M. (2017). Narrative inquiry on the teaching of STEM to blind high school students. Education Sciences7(4), 89.
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/4/89

Lahenius, K., & Martinsuo, M. (2011). Different types of doctoral study processes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(6), 609-623. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.555924
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=66788237&site=ehost-live

Marshall, D., & Case, J. (2010). Rethinking 'disadvantage' in higher education: a paradigmatic case study using narrative analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 491-504. doi:10.1080/03075070903518386
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=52497739&site=ehost-live

Epistemology:

Downey, G.L., & Lucena, J.C. (2004.) Knowledge and professional identity in engineering. History and Technology 20(4): 393-420.
http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=15496342&site=ehost-live

Qualitative Research Considerations and Confusions In Engineering Education:

Baillie, C., & Douglas, E. P. (2014). Confusions and conventions: Qualitative research in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education103(1), 1.                                                                                               

http://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=94447542&site=ehost-live 

Beddoes, K., Schimpf, M. C. M., & Pawley, A. L. (2014). New metaphors for new understandings: Ontological questions about developing grounded theories in engineering education. ASEE Paper ID 9010.
https://peer.asee.org/new-metaphors-for-new-understandings-ontological-questions-about-developing-grounded-theories-in-engineering-education

Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 53-66.
https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.dist.lib.usu.edu/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x

Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging research methodologies in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186-210.
https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.dist.lib.usu.edu/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x

Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., Benson, L. C., Bumbaco, A. E., Kellam, N., Pawley, A. L., & Phillips, C. M. (2017). Qualitative research quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 398-430.
https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.dist.lib.usu.edu/doi/10.1002/jee.20170

 

Need Quick Help?

Chat with a Librarian: