Evidence synthesis follows the processes of planning, identifying, evaluating, collecting, explaining, and summarizing (PIECES) information from existing literature to answer a research question.
The graphic on the right displays a visual representation of the systematic review process which you can see listed below.
The methods of the systematic review are generally decided before conducting it.
Source:
Foster, M. (2018). Systematic reviews service: Introduction to systematic reviews. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from http://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=574702&p=4298724
Searching for studies which match the preset criteria in a systematic manner.
Source:
Foster, M. (2018). Systematic reviews service: Introduction to systematic reviews. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from http://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=574702&p=4298724
Sort all retrieved articles (included or excluded) and assess the risk of bias for each included study.
Source:
Foster, M. (2018). Systematic reviews service: Introduction to systematic reviews. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from http://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=574702&p=4298724
Each study is coded with preset form, either qualitatively or quantitatively synthesize data.
Source:
Foster, M. (2018). Systematic reviews service: Introduction to systematic reviews. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from http://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=574702&p=4298724
Place results of synthesis into context, strengths and weaknesses of the studies.
Source:
Foster, M. (2018). Systematic reviews service: Introduction to systematic reviews. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from http://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=574702&p=4298724
Report provides description of methods and results in a clear and transparent manner.
Source:
Foster, M. (2018). Systematic reviews service: Introduction to systematic reviews. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from http://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=574702&p=4298724
Source:
What Authors Do: Systematic Reviews. Designed by Jessica Kaufman, Cochrane Consumers & Communication Review Group, Centre for Health Communication & Participation, La Trobe University, 2011. Licensed under Creative Commons CC BY 4.0.